Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 F. App'x 682

Willis v. Brune

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided March 21, 2002

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-03-21

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.

Decided 2002-03-21

PER CURIAM.

¶1In these consolidated appeals, James Willis appeals from the district court’s1 orders denying his petition for a writ of mandamus and assessing a filing fee. Having reviewed the record, we conclude the court did not abuse its discretion in denying the petition, see Kerr v. United States Dist. Court, 426 U.S. 394, 403, 96 S.Ct. 2119, 48 L.Ed.2d 725 (1976), and properly assessed the filing fee in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

¶2Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

¶3. The Honorable Gary A. Fenner, United States District Judge for the Western District of Missouri.

/30/fappx/682 · .json · Public domain