Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 F. App'x 92

Raysor v. Eagleton

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided February 26, 2002

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2002-02-26

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Decided 2002-02-26

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Jerry Raysor seeks to appeal the district court’s order denying relief on his petition, construed as filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2254 (West 1994 & Supp.2001). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. See Raysor v. Eagleton, No. CA-01-2656-7-18BG (D.S.C. Sept. 19, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before *93 the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 DISMISSED.

/30/fappx/92 · .json · Public domain