Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 FLA 170 - Armstrong v. State

Armstrong v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
11
states following
November 1995
most recently cited

55 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently November 1995 · most notably Florida East Coast Railway Co. v. Hayes (1914), Carney v. Stringfellow (1917)

55 state decisions — followed in 11 states

13018921900191019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The rule we recognize is, that when evidence is introduced which tends to rebut the presumption of sanity on the part of the accused, and the jury entertain a reasonable doubt, after considering all the evidence as to his sanity, it is their duty to acquit.”.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.