30 F. Supp. 470 - Davidowitz v. Hines’s Empirical Analysis
1939
Citation profile
3 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently September 2009
3 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 41 · 8 U.S.C. § 106
Relies on Ex Parte: Edward T Young · Hague v. Committee for Industrial Organization · William Truax v. Mike Raich · Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. State of West Virginia State of Ohio · Philadelphia Co. v. Stimson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“father or mother of a son or daughter who has served in the service of the United States during any war”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. Davidowitz“shall not have become naturalized within a period of three years”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. Davidowitz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.