30 F. Supp. 2d 1168 - Smith v. Stubblefield’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “The Missouri Department of Corrections inmate grievance procedure consists of four steps. See Certified Inmate Grievance Procedure (IS 8-2.1). First, an inmate may file an Informal Resolution Request (IRR) within fifteen days of the incident at issue, and a staff response is due thirty days after filing. Id. Second, if the inmate is not satisfied with the IRR response, he or she may file an Inmate Grievance form [IGF] within five working days of the inmate's review of the IRR response. A staff response is due thirty days after filing. If no response is received within that time, the inmate may request an Inmate Grievance Appeal form. Id. Third, if the inmate is not satisfied with the grievance response, he or she may file an appeal within five working days of the response. Id. Fourth, if the inmate does not obtain a satisfactory response to the appeal, he or she may file a second appeal. Id.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 345 F. Supp. 2d 1018 - Dashley v. Correctional Medical Services, Inc.

2. “(1) [s]ubject to the provisions of paragraph (2), in any action brought pursuant to [ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ] by an adult convicted of a crime confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility, the court shall, if the court believes that such a requirement would be appropriate and in the interests of justice, continue such a case for a period of not to exceed 180 days in order to require exhaustion of such plain, speedy, and effective administrative remedies as are available. (2) the exhaustion of administrative remedies under paragraph (1) may not be required unless the Attorney General has certified or the court has determined that such administrative remedies are in substantial compliance with the minimum acceptable standards promulgated under subsection (b) of this section or are otherwise fair or effective.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 50 F. Supp. 2d 544 - Langford v. Couch

3. “[§ 1997e(a)] does not require exhaustion of all remedies; it requires the exhaustion of'such administrative remedies as are available.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. Robert Foulk v. Ronald Charrier