Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 FSUPP3D 413 - Greidinger v. Almand

Greidinger v. Almand’s Empirical Analysis

2014

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 6 · 42 U.S.C. § 666 (§ 466 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 552A (§ 3 of the Privacy Act of 1974)

Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Presley v. City of Charlottesville · Roy Richard Dittman v. State of California · Aziz v. Alcolac, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “1. Defendants James W. Almand, et al.’ s Motion to Dismiss, or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment, construed as a Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 17), is GRANTED; 2. Plaintiff Michael Tankersley’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 6) is MOOT; 3. This case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; 4. The Clerk of the Court transmit copies of this Order and accompanying Memorandum Opinion to the parties; and 5. The Clerk of Court CLOSE this case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the attached cover sheet explained that Mr. Tankersley was suspended due to his failure to provide his Social Security number. Compl.. Ex. C, at 1-2. . Plaintiff filed this claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . . 42 U.S.C. § 666 , or the Welfare Reform Act, authorizes the state-run collection of Social Security numbers of applicants for professional licenses. Under Section 666(a),”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.