Hendricks v. Starkist Co.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 161 · 21 U.S.C. § 337 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 341 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act) · 21 U.S.C. § 360K (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Papasan v. Allain · Hines v. Davidowitz · Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. Paul
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“contained an adequate amount of tuna for a 5-ounce can and that Trader Joe's Tuna is legal for sale in the United States.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he appearance of the can itself, not its label, [that] Plaintiff alleges to be misleading.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[c]onform[s] to the promises or affirmations of fact made on the container or label if any.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.