Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 GA 619 - Durham v. Holeman

Durham v. Holeman’s Empirical Analysis

1860

Citation profile

24
cited by 24 later decisions
1
states following
November 2002
most recently cited

24 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently November 2002

24 state decisions

50186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Before secondary evidence of the contents of a lost deed can be gone into, the existence and execution of such deed must be established by proof.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.