Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 GAAPP 697 - Southeastern Express Co. v. Edmondson

Southeastern Express Co. v. Edmondson’s Empirical Analysis

1923

Citation profile

54
cited by 54 later decisions
3
states following
January 1984
most recently cited

54 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently January 1984 · most notably 92 Ga. App. 273 - Ideal Mutual Insurance Co. v. Ray (1955), 138 Ga. App. 778 - Argonaut Insurance v. Cline (1976)

54 state decisions

1601923193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Flucker v. Carnegie Steel Co. · Thompson v. Twiss · Gurski v. Susquehanna Coal Co. · Grabowski v. Miskell · Orsinie v. Torrance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We cannot say that the portion of the report which we have quoted at length above is not a statement of the commissioner's findings. The record does not demand the conclusion that it is merely a part of his narrative of the evidence. It appears to us to be a statement of his findings, succeeded by a story of the evidence upon which it is based. If the quoted statement may with equal reason be said to be the one or the other, it should be construed, after judgment, to be that which will make the judgment valid.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “A repetition of the evidence heard is not a compliance with the act, because it is the duty of the commission to weigh the evidence and to declare what it finds to be the truth. Some of the witnesses might make a case demanding compensation, while the evidence of others might demand just the opposite. A mere narrative of conflicting testimony would leave it impossible for a reviewing court to determine whether the truth of the transaction as conceived by the commission would support its decree.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In order to clear the record as far as rules are concerned....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.