30 Ill. App. 3d 242 - People v. Gamboa’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2002 · most notably 205 Ill. 2d 480 - People v. Peeples (2002), 51 Ill. App. 3d 549 - People v. Boyce (1977)
45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · 56 Ill. 2d 493 - People v. Lilly · People v. Munday · 43 Ill. 2d 273 - The PEOPLE v. Rose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Alleged errors which appear solely from an affidavit accompanying a motion for a new trial need not be considered. (City of Chicago v. Quane (1968), 98 Ill. App. 2d 100 , 240 N.E.2d 150 .) The affidavit was based on hearsay — information the attorney said he received from Olague?. Hearsay is not a sufficient basis for a new trial motion. (Smith v. Illinois Valley Ice Cream Co. (1959), 20 Ill. App. 2d 312 , 156 N.E.2d 361 ; Wilke v. U.S. (9th Cir. 1970), 422 F.2d 1298 .) The trial court did not err in denying the defendant’s motion for an evidentiary hearing.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.