30 Ill. App. 3d 864 - Stemm v. Rupel’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 17 Ill. App. 3d 667 - Yarc v. American Hospital Supply Corp. · 12 Ill. App. 3d 453 - Martin v. Kralis Poultry Co. · 133 Ill. App. 2d 703 - Burdin v. Jefferson Trust & Savings Bank · Courtney v. Board of Education · 116 Ill. App. 2d 466 - Country Mutual Insurance v. Drendel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““But even if the plaintiff had applied for and received money under the Act, that could not affect his right to maintain this suit if his injuries had not, in fact, resulted from an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment. [Citations.]” 30 Ill. App. 3d 864, 868 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.