Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 KAN 476 - State v. Teissedre

State v. Teissedre’s Empirical Analysis

1883

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
6
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

1 district · 14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 2011

1 district · 14 state decisions

5018831890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Lemp

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It was no error for the court below to instruct the jury ‘that beer is presumed to be intoxicating, until the contrary is proved.’ In the absence of evidence to the contrary, beer will always be presumed to be an intoxicating liquor.” (p. 484.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.