Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Kan. App. 2d 1125 - State v. Luttig

30 Kan. App. 2d 1125 - State v. Luttig’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
April 2007
most recently cited

11 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Maryland v. Buie · State v. Nunn · Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc. · State v. Smith · State v. Clements

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““protective sweep exception should be expanded to allow pre-arrest warrantless searches if the officer has a reasonable belief, based on specific and articulable facts, that the area to be swept harbors someone posing a danger to those on the scene. The argument boils down to a defendant’s expectation of privacy within their home versus officer safety.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.