30 Mass. App. Ct. 685 - Commonwealth v. Morgan’s Empirical Analysis
1991
Citation profile
16
cited by 16 later decisions
3
states following
August 2008
most recently cited
16 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth v. Latimore · Commonwealth v. O'DELL · Commonwealth v. Daye · Commonwealth v. Mayfield · Commonwealth v. Swenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“jury verdict in a criminal case is not effective unless there has been oral affirmance of the verdict by the jurors.”); State v. Reid, 166 Wis.2d 139 , 479 N.W.2d 572, 574 (Ct.App.1991) (concluding that”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Jones v. State“We assume, at least for purposes of this case, that any hearsay exception relating to extrajudicial identifications would also relate to an extrajudicial description of clothing.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stratton
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.