30 Md. App. 406 - Van Meter v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
61 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 61 later decisions — most recently March 2019 · most notably 43 Md. App. 446 - Federal Land Bank of Baltimore, Inc. v. Esham (1979), ACandS Inc. v. Asner (1996)
61 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Holt v. United States · Breeding v. State · Grammer v. State · Seidman v. State · Hyde v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“.... We cannot be expected to delve through the record to unearth factual support favorable to appellant and then seek out law to sustain his position. Cf. Clarke v. State, 238 Md. 11 .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"The Court of Appeals has held that issues can be waived for failure to comply with the procedural requirements to preserve the right of appellate review. Harmon v. State Roads Comm., 242 Md. 24, 29-32 ; Hyde v. State, 228 Md. 209, 218 ; see also Comptroller v. Aerial Products, 210 Md. 627, 644-645 . `Surely it is not incumbent upon this Court, merely because a point is mentioned as being objectionable at some point in a party's brief, to scan the entire record and ascertain if there be any ground, or grounds, to sustain the objectionable feature suggested.' State Roads Comm. v. Halle, 228 Md. 24, 32 . * * * ".... We cannot be expected to delve through the record to unearth factual support favorable to appellant and then seek out law to sustain his position. Cf. Clarke v. State, 238 Md. 11 ."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[f]or reasons unexplained, the transcript of the voir dire examination and jury selection are not in the record. The burden to provide such transcript is also appellant’s if he intends to rely thereon. Md.Rule 1026 a 2 [now incorporated into Md.Rule 8-411] places the burden upon appellant to provide a “transcript of all the testimony.” Thus, in the absence of any jury selection testimony in the transcript, he may not argue for reversal based thereon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.