Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 Miss. 273

Eckford v. Halbert

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1855

Mississippi Supreme Court · decided 1855-12-15

In error from the District Chancery Court at Fulton. Hon. Henry Dickinson, vice chancellor. The defendants in error, on the 26th of March, 1854, filed their bill against plaintiffs in error, for a’specific performance of a contract for the sale of land. In their bill they allege, that on the 6th of July, 1849, they contracted with said Eckford and Gates, to sell them certain lots, in the town of Aberdeen, for $1300.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1855-12-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently October 1921

4 state decisions

1018551860187018801890190019101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Fisher, J.,

¶1delivered the opinion of the court.

¶2This was a bill filed in the Yice Chancery Court at Fulton, to compel a specific performance of a contract for the sale of land.

¶3The appellees, as appears by the allegations of the bill, sold to the appellants a tract of land, and executed their bond, with a covenant to mate a good and sufficient title to the vendees on the payment of the purchase-money\\The covenants to make title, and to pay the money, are concurrent; and neither party can insist on a performance of the contract, without an offer or tender of performance on his part.'^''

¶4It does not appear by the bill, that the complainants have brought themselves within the operation of this rule, nor do they by their bill offer to perform their covenant. The complainants could not under the same state of facts recover at law, for the manifest reason that no breach of the contract is shown. The rule applies with equal force to proceedings in equity, to subject the land to the payment of the purchase-money. The question is, are the vendees in default in making payment ? The answer is, they are not, until a tender of performance by the other party.

¶5Decree reversed, demurrer to bill sustained, leave to complain- > ants to amend their bill, and cause remanded.

/30/miss/273 · .json · Public domain