Moore v. Akins’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently February 2017
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 832 · 10 U.S.C. § 843 · 10 U.S.C. § 857 · 10 U.S.C. § 867 · 10 U.S.C. § 920 · 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“According to the Senate Report at 2-3, Article 57(d) would “authorize convening authorities to defer execution of certain sentences to confinement during the appellate review process, thus providing for the first time a procedure similar to release on bail pending appeal in civilian courts.” 1968 U.S.Code Cong. & Admin.News at 4503; 114 Cong.Rec. at 29398 (emphasis added).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Addis v. Thorsen“decision of a Court of Military Review and a mandate issued by a federal court of appeals. Indeed, one of the main purposes of the Military Justice Act of 1968 was to transmute the”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.