Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 N.C. App. 403

226 S.E.2d 858

Black v. Black

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 4, 1976

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · decided 1976-08-04

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently September 1989

2 state decisions

Relies on 21 N.C. App. 339 - Kohler v. Kohler

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1976-08-04

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BROCK, Chief Judge.

¶1 The purpose of the speedy proceedings for alimony pen-dente lite is to give the dependent spouse subsistence and counsel fees pending trial of the action on its merits. This result places the dependent spouse on a more nearly equal footing with the supporting spouse for purposes of preparing for and prosecuting the dependent spouse’s claim. The final merits of the action are not before the trial judge upon a pendente lite hearing. Therefore, upon a pendente lite hearing, the trial judge may not determine the ultimate property rights of the parties. Kohler v. Kohler, 21 N.C. App. 339, 204 S.E. 2d 177 (1974).

¶2 In this case the trial judge undertook to determine matters of constitutional proportions concerning the ultimate property rights of the parties. At this pendente lite stage of the proceedings, without consent of the parties to a hearing on the merits and waivers of jury trial, the trial judge was without jurisdiction to proceed in this action as he undertook to do.

¶3 The order appealed from is vacated, and the cause is remanded to the district court for such proceedings as may be appropriate.

¶4 Vacated and remanded.

Judges Britt and Vaughn concur.
/30/ncapp/403 · .json · Public domain