Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 NCAPP 59 - State v. Carter

State v. Carter’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mullaney v. Wilbur · Indiana Employment Security Division v. Burney · State v. Hankerson · State v. McWilliams · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a]rraignment consists of bringing a defendant in open court ... before a judge having jurisdiction to try the offense, advising him of the charges pending against him, and directing him to plead.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the purpose of an arraignment is to advise the defendant of the crime with which he is charged[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.