Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 NEV 146 - Kirman v. Johnson

Kirman v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1908

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
September 1929
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently September 1929

11 state decisions

40190819101920decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corbett v. Job · Nesbitt v. Chisholm · Marx v. Lewis · Robinson v. Benson · Menzies v. Kennedy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An examination of. the papers appearing to have been sent up in this case fails to disclose any order in reference to the motion for a new trial, ór a copy thereof, nor does the certificate of the clerk mention any such order. So far as the record shows, there may never have been such an order made. ” In the case now under consideration, the certificate of the clerk does mention and refer to an”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.