30 N.M. 160
228 P 888
Decided September 9, 1924
New Mexico Supreme Court · decided 1924-09-09
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1924-09-09
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently December 2013
2 federal appellate · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 The parties disagreed as to whether appellant was employed as housekeeper for a definite term, or was employed from month to month. The case was tried by the court, and he found the issues for appellees. The evidence was conflicting, but the court’s finding is supported by substantial evidence. Under such circumstances, the finding will not be disturbed.
¶2 It follows that the judgment of the court below is correct and should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.