30 Ohio App. 3d 54 - State v. Darga’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
November 2007
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Dehass · State v. Williams · State v. Henderson · 68 Ohio App. 2d 151 - State v. Kent
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[w]here the same conduct by defendant can be construed to constitute two or more allied offenses of similar import, the indictment or information may contain counts for all such offenses, but the defendant may be convicted of only one.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[h]owever, R.C. 2941.25 has not been interpreted to mean that a person cannot be indicted or charged, tried, and found guilty of multiple offenses, even when they are allied offenses.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.