Howard v. Allen’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 65 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably Vaccariello v. Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc. (2002), 167 Ohio App. 3d 809 - Burns v. Prudential Securities, Inc. (2006)
13 federal appellate · 41 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson · Wells v. Simonds Abrasive Co. · McKnett v. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. · The Bank of the United States v. Andrew Donnally
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 65 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Section 142: “Statutes of Limitations of Forum * * “(2) An action will be maintained if it is not barred by the statute of limitations of the forum, even though it would be barred by the statute of limitations of another state, except as stated in § 143.” Id. at 396. Section 143: “Foreign Statute of Limitations Barring the Right “An action will not be entertained in another state if it is barred in the state of the otherwise applicable law by a statute of limitations which bars the right and not merely the remedy.” Id. at 400.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“(Emphasis added.) See Am.H.B. No. 1, 125 Ohio Laws 7. We construed this language as permitting refiling only when the dismissed action had been commenced or attempted to be commenced in Ohio within the applicable limitations period. Howard 's reasoning, however, no longer withstands scrutiny. {¶ 28} In Howard , we concluded that the Ohio statute of limitations applied to all actions filed in this state and that”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In an action commenced, or attempted to be commenced, * * * if the plaintiff fails otherwise than upon the merits, and the time limited for the commencement of such action at the date of * * * failure has expired, the plaintiff * * * may commence a new action within one year after such date.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.