Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 OHIOST3D 80 - Dent v. Winkle

Dent v. Winkle’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
January 1997
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 38 Colo. App. 489 - Lemler v. Real Estate Commission · Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. American Excelsior Corp. · 33 Ohio St. 2d 1 - Smith v. Jaggers · Baltimore Savings & Loan Co. v. Frye · Martin v. State of Arizona Real Estate Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In order to satisfy the requirements for payment from the Real Estate Recovery Fund, R.C. 4735.12, the party allegedly harmed must obtain a judgment against a broker or salesman, licensed under R.C. Chapter 4735, on the grounds of conduct that is in violation of that chapter.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) He has obtained a judgment, as provided in this division;”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “This first paragraph of subsection (B) details four criteria which must be met in order to entitle a person to participation in the recovery fund: (1) obtaining a final judgment, (2) against a licensed broker or salesman, (3) on the grounds of a violation of R.C. Chapter 4735, and (4) which occurred after March 4, 1975.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.