Mayo v. Mills

Decided December 12, 1911

Supreme Court of Oklahoma · decided 1911-12-12

Error from District Court, Sequoyah County; John H. Pitchford, Judge. Action in replevin by James M. Mayo and John R. Mayfield, of the firm of Mayo & Mayfield, against Thomas Mills and Lucy Mills. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiffs bring error.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 1915

1 state decisions

Relies on Walker v. Hannewincle · Lebreton v. Swartzel · Davis v. Elliott

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Appeal dismissed · Decided 1911-12-12

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Opinion by

ROBERTSON, C.

¶2 The petition in error and case-made in this appeal were filed in this court on January 11, 1910. No brief, as required by rule 7 (20 Okla. viii, 95 Pac. vi) of this court, has been filed, and no excuse has been offered for the failure to so file, and by authority of Davis v. Elliott, 25 Okla. 433, 106 Pac. 838, the plaintiffs in error have waived then-right to have the appeal heard in this court, and the same is hereby dismissed.

¶3 See, also, LeBreton v. Swartzel, 14 Okla. 521, 78 Pac. 323; Walker v. Hannewincle, 24 Okla. 152, 103 Pac. 585.

¶4 By the Court: It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.