30 Or. App. 779 - State v. Crampton’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “no post-seizure lien can be created where the subject property has been thus seized.” The special concurrence stressed that the pivitol time after which no further liens may attach is the moment when the state takes physical possession of the vehicle. The Supreme Court of Iowa has interpreted the Act’s forfeiture provision as requiring the validity of an alleged secured party’s interest in a seized vehicle to be determined”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Corner Stone Bank