Davis v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2001
Citation profile
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 98 Wash. 2d 434 - Wilson v. Steinbach · 93 Wash. 2d 127 - Egede-Nissen v. Crystal Mountain, Inc. · 121 Wash. 2d 38 - Van Dinter v. City of Kennewick · Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power · Ravenscroft v. Washington Water Power Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A]ny public or private landowners or others in lawful possession and control of any lands . . . who allow members of the public to use them for the purposes of outdoor recreation . . . without charging a fee of any kind therefor, shall not be liable for unintentional injuries to such users.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“Washington's recreational use statutes were intended to modify the common law duty owed to public invitees so as to encourage landowners to open up their lands to the public for recreational purposes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.