Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 P3D 667 - People v. Grant

People v. Grant’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
May 2020
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently May 2020

7 state decisions

30200120102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on M.S. v. People · Nicholas v. People · People, in Interest of Gwr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This express waiver shall be in writing and shall be obtained only after full advisement of the juvenile and his or her parent, guardian, or legal or physical custodian of the juvenile's rights prior to the taking of the custodial statement by a law enforcement official.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (1) of this section, the juvenile and his or her parent, guardian, or legal or physical custodian may expressly waive the requirement.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.