Wilson v. Rodeman’s Empirical Analysis
1889
Citation profile
2 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently February 1942
2 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““As we understand it, there are only two questions in the case: one of fact as to the character of the tenancy — whether it was indefinite as to its termination, and, therefore, ‘from year to year,’ and, if so, whether, as fnatter of law, the end of the calendar year should be fixed for its termination. There seems to be no dispute that the first renting in June, 1882, was indefinite as to time, except requiring the rent 'monthly;’ that, under the statute, was to June, 1883, and, the defendant having held over, it became a tenancy from year to year.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maynard v. Campbell““Whenever one person holds land of another, and there is no express limitation or agreement as to the time for which it is to be held, then, if the rent is payable with reference to the divisions of the year (e. g., quarterly), the tenancy is deemed from year to year.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Maynard v. Campbell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.