Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 So. 3d 157 - State v. Joseph

30 So. 3d 157 - State v. Joseph’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
October 2017
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · State v. Oliveaux · State v. Weiland · Epps v. West · Hetzel v. Prince William County

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he misappropriation or taking of anything of value which belongs to another, either without the consent of the other to the misappropriation or taking, or by means of fraudulent conduct, practices, or representations. An intent to deprive the other permanently of whatever may be the subject of the misappropriation or taking is essential.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.