30 So. 3d 339 - Stringer Ex Rel. Stringer v. Trapp’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
21 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Smith v. Sanders · 931 So. 2d 1274 - Scaggs v. GPCH-GP, INC. · 868 So. 2d 997 - Wayne General Hosp. v. Hayes · 959 So. 2d 1004 - Sutherland v. Estate of Ritter · 991 So. 2d 162 - Huss v. Gayden
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he question of whether a statute of limitations is tolled by the discovery rule often turns on the factual determination of what the plaintiff knew and when. Thus, occasionally the question of whether the suit is barred by the statute of limitations is a question of fact for the jury; . however, as with other putative fact questions, the question may be taken away from the jury if reasonable minds could not differ as to the conclusion.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage“- The issue'of whethér the applicable statute of limitations has run is a question of law. In reviewing the grant or denial of a motion for summary judgment, the standard of review is de novo. If no genuine issue of material fact exists and the moving party is entitled to summary judgment as a matter.-of law, summary judgment should be entered in that party’s favor. The,burden is upon the- moving party, and the evidence should be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“statute of limitations begins to run when the patient can reasonably be held to have knowledge of the injury itself, the cause of the injury, and the causative relationship between the injury and the conduct of the medical practitioner.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.