Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 SO3D 370 - AGENT v. State

AGENT v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Fare v. Michael C. · Brown v. State · 584 So. 2d 426 - Mohr v. State · 728 So. 2d 565 - Kirksey v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) written notice of the claimed violations of probation; (2) disclosure to the probationer of the evidence against him; (3) an opportunity to be heard in person and to present witnesses and documentary evidence; (4) the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer finds good cause for not allowing such confrontation); (5) a neutral and detached hearing body or officer; and (6) a written statement by the fact-finder as to the evidence relied on and reasons for revoking the probation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.