Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 So. 3d 656

Martinez v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2010-03-17

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently April 2017

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2010-03-17

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1 Defendant, Jimmy Martinez, appeals an “Order Denying Defendant’s Pro Se Motion for Post Conviction Relief’ entered January 7, 2010. Although the order correctly identifies the defendant and Circuit Court case number in the caption, the text of the order identifies the defendant by the name “Vincent Ham” at the only two places in the body of the order using the defendant’s name. Nor is there any indication that the defendant was known by that name as an alias.

¶2 Accordingly, the order below is reversed and remanded so that a corrected order can be entered and served upon the defendant.

/30/so3d/656 · .json · Public domain