Fuller v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2018
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Anders v. California
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and violations of Brady v. Maryland "); Fuller v. State , 30 S.W.3d 441 , 445 (Tex. App.-Texarkana 2000, pet. denied) ("Fuller's pro se brief makes three general points: the failure of this Court to 'investigate' his appeal; his alleged mental incompetence; and the alleged ineffectiveness of his court-appointed counsel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fratta v. Davis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.