Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 TC 969 - August v. Commissioner

August v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
July 1981
most recently cited

4 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently July 1981

4 federal appellate ·

1001958196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Theatres Corp. v. Bertha Building Corp. · Raymond G. Burge and Kathleen E. Burge v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue · Sorin v. Commissioner · Pool v. Commissioner · Commissioner v. Gross

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the evidence * * * persuasively and convincingly shows not only that the distribution herein was attributable to circumstances which could be anticipated at the time of construction of the apartments, and was contemplated as a recognized possibility, but that the circumstances to which the distribution was attributable were in fact so anticipated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the gain attributable to the property referred to in section 117(m) (2) (A) is the excess of the recognized gain of the shareholder during the taxable year upon his stock in the collapsible corporation over the recognized gain which the shareholder would have if the property had not been * * * constructed,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “In arriving at this conclusion the court considered that under the regulation it is sufficient if the circumstances which brought on or resulted in the distribution could, in reason, be anticipated at the time of the construction and that such a distribution was contemplated”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.