Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

30 Tex. 51

Williams v. Downes

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1867

Texas Supreme Court · decided 1867-04-15

Error from Houston. The case was tried before Hon. Reuben A. Reeves, one of the district judges. The returns read: “Executed August 10,1860, by delivering to W. W. Williams a copy of this citation, and a certified copy of plaintiff’s petition.” And “ Executed the same day, by delivering to John H. Bennett, in person, a true copy of the within citation, and also a true copy of the plaintiff’s petitiofi.” The judgment was by default.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1927

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1867-04-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Willie, J.

¶1Our statute makes it the duty of the sheriff" to indorse on all process and precepts coming to Ms hands the day on which he received them, the manner in which he executed them, and the day when he executed them, and to sign his return officially. (O. & W. Dig., Art. 1856.) Upon an examination of the writ in this case, directed to the sheriff for service on Bennett, we find that the return thereon does not show when it was received, or when service of the same was made. Every defendant against whom suit is brought to the district court is entitled to five full days’ notice thereof previous to the first day of the term to which it is returnable. The fact that such service was made at the proper time, and in the manner prescribed bylaw, should affirmatively appear by the sheriff’s indorsement, or it should be shown in the record that it was waived by the defendant. A judgment by default taken without such showing will be set aside by this court.

¶2The judgment is reversed, and the cause

¶3Remanded.

/30/tex/51 · .json · Public domain