Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 U.S. 457 - John Hawkins and William May v. Joshua Barney's Lessee

John Hawkins and William May v. Joshua Barney's Lessee’s Empirical Analysis

30 U.S. 457 · 1831

Citation profile

98
cited by 98 later decisions
34
cited 34 times by the Supreme Court
15
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 98 later decisions (34 by the Supreme Court) — most recently July 2018 · most notably Erie Co v. Tompkins (1938), Home Building & Loan Ass'n v. Blaisdell (1934)

14 federal appellate · 1 district · 26 state decisions — followed in 15 states

1701831184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson ex dem. Curtis v. Bronson · Hubbell v. Coudrey · Hess v. Werts · Gaskins v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 98 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is not to be questioned that laws limiting the time of bringing suit constitute a part of the lex fori of ever}' country. They are laws for the administering justice — one of the most sacred and important sovereign rights and duties — and a restriction which must materially affect both legislative and judicial independence.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “What right has any one to complain, when a reasonable time has been given to him, if he has not been vigilant in asserting his rights?”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““The right to appropriate a derelict is one of universal law, well known to the civil law, the common law, and to all law: it existed in a state of nature, and is only modified by society, according to the discretion of each community. What is the evidence of an individual having abandoned his rights or property? It is clear that the subject is one over which every community is at liberty to make a rule for itself. . . .” (Emphasis added.) 30 U.S. at 467 .”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.