State v. Winslow’s Empirical Analysis
1906
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2014
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on People v. Stratton · Stephen v. State · Porath v. State · People v. Lambert · People v. Kaiser
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he great weight of authority is to the effect that when the incestuous fornication is shown to have been committed by the defendant with full knowledge of the relationship between himself and the other participant, though he used force in the accomplishment of his object, he may, nevertheless, be convicted of the crime of incest. ... The defendant’s guilt here is measured by his knowledge and intent, and not by the knowledge and intent of his daughter on whom he committed the offense.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Montoya · Douglas v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.