Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Utah 2d 298 - State v. Davenport

30 Utah 2d 298 - State v. Davenport’s Empirical Analysis

1973

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
December 2011
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently December 2011

10 state decisions

4019731980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anders v. California · 18 Utah 2d 153 - State v. Seymour · 10 Utah 2d 171 - State v. Iverson · State v. Romeo · 19 Utah 2d 229 - Hartman v. Weggeland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “in favor of the defendant upor: a motion to quash the information or indict ment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “From all final judgments of the district courts, there shall be a right of appeal to the Supreme Court...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “a quashing of the entire proceeding, ... includ[ing] the quashing of the information,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.