30 Utah 2d 423 - Jensen v. Eames’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
25 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently January 2022 · most notably Baldwin v. Burton (1993), In Re McNeely (1985)
25 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Marshall Durbin Farms, Inc. v. National Farmers Organization, Inc. · Sackin v. Kersting · Sackin v. Kersting · 10 Ariz. App. 340 - Sackin v. Kersting · Hilton Bros. Motor v. District Court Ex Rel. Millard County
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'[al judgment creditor may litigate the question of a fraudulent conveyance in a garnishment proceeding, in a creditor's bill in equity, or in an execution proceeding, provided that once contested the burden is upon the one alleging the fraudulent conveyance to prove by clear and convincing evidence that the transfer was in fact fraudulent'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“This type of problem involves a common sense and equitable accommodation of the amended rules to pending actions. If rights will be impaired, the amended procedure should not be applied, but where there will be no impairment the remedial provisions of the amended rules should be applied.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Morse v. Packer“[When property is levied upon pursuant to a writ of attachment, plaintiff acquires an inchoate or contingent lien or interest in the property attached,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.