Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Va. App. 219 - Moss v. Commonwealth

30 Va. App. 219 - Moss v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
May 2007
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · United States v. Robinson · Texas v. Brown · Knowles v. Iowa · United States v. Security Industrial Bank

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “extended to a strip search or a body cavity search. The Commonwealth's reliance upon consent for this intrusion is misplaced. Additionally, the Commonwealth does not satisfy the additional requirements for such an intrusion without consent or without a warrant. We do not address issues concerning the place and manner of the search because we find that there was not a”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “that the strip search ... was impermissible and that the trial [judge] erred in refusing to suppress the evidence obtained from the search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.