30 Va. App. 352 - Gates v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

18 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “[T]he Miranda safeguards come into play whenever a person in custody is subjected to either express questioning or its functional equivalent. That is to say, the term “interrogation” under Miranda refers not only to express questioning, but also to any words or actions on the part of the police (other than those normally attendant to arrest and custody) that the police should know are reasonably likely to elicit an incriminating response from the suspect. The latter portion of this definition focuses primarily upon the perceptions of the suspect rather than the intent of the police.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. 58 Va. App. 13 - Quarles v. Commonwealth · 82 Va. Cir. 196 - Commonwealth v. Harris

2. “If a [suspect's] statement is `not foreseeable, then it is volunteered.'”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. 38 Va. App. 206 - Watts v. Commonwealth · 58 Va. App. 13 - Quarles v. Commonwealth