Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 30 Wash. 2d 734 - Williams v. Brockman

30 Wash. 2d 734 - Williams v. Brockman’s Empirical Analysis

1948

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1991
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Estill v. Berry · Ogilvie v. Hong · Crown v. Miller

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A pedestrian must use the right of way accorded him by statute at a recognized street crossing, with due care for his own safety. By his negligence, a pedestrian may subject himself to a ruling that he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, or he may by his conduct justify a finding by the trier of the fact that he was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of fact. Those are questions which must be determined in each individual case as it arises.” 2”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““You are instructed that if you find that decedent walked into or against the side of the defendant Hong’s car, then the decedent was guilty of negligence as a matter of law * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.