30 Wash. App. 229 - State v. Cameron’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably 102 Wash. 2d 87 - State v. Osborne (1984), State v. Corchado (1986)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Bordenkircher v. Hayes · Cooper v. Fitzharris · Wilbert Herring v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of Corrections · Cuthrell v. Director, Patuxent Institution · 87 Wash. 2d 501 - Wood v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“actually and substantially [assist] his client in deciding whether to plead guilty.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage“[restitution does not turn on a defendant’s personal history, but the possibility of restitution stems directly from the conviction of a crime that results in some pecuniary gain to the defendant or loss to the victim. RCW 9A.20.030. We conclude that restitution is a direct consequence of entering a guilty plea and the sentencing court may not impose restitution upon a defendant who pleads guilty, unless defendant is advised of that possibility prior to entering his plea.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“A consequence is direct ... if it has a definite, immediate and largely automatic effect on the range of the defendant's punishment ... Victim restitution is a direct consequence of the plea.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Kealoha.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.