30 Wash. App. 268 - State v. Parris’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

13 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the better view is that the statements should be viewed as a whole in determining their admissibility; given the broad language of ER 804(b)(3) we do not believe the intent of the rule is to exclude collateral matter which, when viewed out of context, may not be disserving.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 31 Wash. App. 63 - State v. Valladares

2. “partly from a misreading of Supreme Court decisions regarding the confrontation clause and partly from legislative oversight.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 98 Wash. 2d 140 - State v. Parris

3. “Well, do you think he'll return with the drugs, or the money, and the quantity and quality would be accurate?”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 98 Wash. 2d 140 - State v. Parris