30 Wash. App. 887 - State v. Schmidt’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1983
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Ewell · Halliday v. United States · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 87 Wash. 2d 922 - Johnson v. Morris · 87 Wash. 2d 501 - Wood v. Morris
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The time limits set forth in subsections (b)(2) and (b)(3) shall commence to run from the date: (a) of the order binding the defendant over to the superior court following a preliminary hearing pursuant to JCrR 2.03 or (b) of the tenth day following the defendant's arrest in the event a preliminary hearing is not held or the charge is initially filed in the superior court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Middleton“the rule announced in [ Edwards ] seems to be nothing more than an interpretation of an existing rule, the former CrR 3.3.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.