30 Wash. App. 89 - State v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
13 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Withrow v. Larkin · United States v. Tropiano · 92 Wash. 2d 671 - State v. Johnson · 91 Wash. 2d 638 - State v. Wicke · 92 Wash. 2d 415 - Automobile Drivers & Demonstrators Union Local No. 882 v. Department of Retirement Systems
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[p]retrial hearings are but mechanical devices designed to effectuate substantive rights and remedies.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“1A N. Singer, Statutory Construction § 20.09 (4th ed. 1985). Definitions are integral to the statutory scheme and of the highest value in determining legislative intent. To ignore a definition section is to refuse to give legal effect to a part of the statutory law of the state. (Citations omitted.) State v. Taylor, 30 Wn. App. 89, 95 , 632 P.2d 892 (1981). We hold that the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“precisely conform to the bifurcated procedure contemplated by the rules, CrR 3.5, 4.5” it does not amount to a denial of due process absent”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.