30 Wash. App. 901 - State v. Woolworth’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 2015
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 93 Wash. 2d 510 - State v. Shipp · 92 Wash. 2d 967 - State v. Huelett · 27 Wash. App. 309 - State v. Russell · 28 Wash. App. 243 - State v. Simmons
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“within the sound discretion of the trial court; the court's decision will not be reversed absent manifest abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[w]hen acting knowingly suffices to establish an element, such element also is established if a person acts intentionally.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when [a person] acts with the objective or purpose to accomplish a result which constitutes a crime”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.