Krueger v. Steffen’s Empirical Analysis
1966
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2005
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Geuder, Paeschke & Frey Co. v. City of Milwaukee · Kimball v. Antigo Building Supply Co. · Vetter v. Rein · Thompson v. Princeton
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court on numerous occasions has stated that the damages that should be awarded to the owner of personal property having a market value is the difference between the value before the tortious injury and the value after. . . .” 23”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““[A]s a general rule in tort actions there may be recovery for loss of profits if the plaintiff can show with reasonable certainty the anticipation of profit.” Krueger v. Steffen (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 445, 450 , 141 N. W. 2d 200 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““The finding of a trial court will be set aside upon appeal only if it is contrary to the great weight and clear preponderance of the evidence.” Krueger v. Steffen (1966), 30 Wis. 2d 445, 448 , 141 N. W. 2d 200 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.