Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

300 Conn. 904

12 A.3d 1002

State v. Pires

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 1, 2011

Supreme Court of Connecticut · decided 2011-02-01

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently February 2023 · most notably Sousa v. Sousa (2016), Stechel v. Foster (2011)

32 state decisions

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to self-representation?”

quoted by 1 later decision, including State v. Pires

Relies on 122 Conn. App. 729 - State v. Pires

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2011-02-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 122 Conn. App. 729 (AC 30860), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*905The Supreme Court docket number is SC 18742.April E. Brodeur, special public defender, in support of the petition.John P. Gravalec-Pannone, senior assistant state’s attorney, in opposition.Decided February 1, 2011
“Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the defendant was not deprived of his constitutional right to self-representation?”
/300/conn/904 · .json · Public domain